EFFECTS OF SWITCHING CONTINGENCIES IN A TWO-CHOICE SITUATION = EFFETS DES CONTINGENCES DE CHANGEMENT DANS UN SITUATION A 2 CHOIXROGERS HE; KEISTER RS; WILLIAMS DT et al.1973; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 97; NO 2; PP. 242-248; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

REINFORCEMENT PROBABILITY AND CONCURRENT OPERANTSROSENBERG J.1974; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 4; NO 6; PP. 582-584; BIBL. 10REF.Article

MAXIMIZING AND MATCHING ON CONCURRENT RATIO SCHEDULESHERRNSTEIN RJ; LOVELAND DH.1975; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 107-116; BIBL. 18REFArticle

THE "GAMBLER EFFECT": CHOICE AND THE PROBABILITY OF REINFORCEMENT OF SMALL RESPONSE OUTPUTS. = L'EFFET DU JOUEUR: CHOIX ET PROBABILITE DE RENFORCEMENT DES PETITS INTERVALLES DE REPONSEBOEVING RS; RANDOLPH JJ.1975; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 37; NO 1; PP. 55-62; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

PROBABILITE DE RENFORCEMENT ET EPUISEMENT NERVEUX CHEZ DES CHIENS NON MAINTENUSMEKHEDOVA A YA.1975; ZH. VYSSH. NERV. DEJATELN. I.P. PAVLOVA; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1975; VOL. 25; NO 6; PP. 1188-1195; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

SECOND-ORDER SCHEDULES OF TOKEN REINFORCEMENT: EFFECTS OF VARYING THE SCHEDULE OF FOOD PRESENTATION.MALAGODI EF; WEBBE FM; WADDELL TR et al.1975; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 173-181; BIBL. 1 P.Article

WHAT IS A !!SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT''SCHOENFELD WN; COLE BK.1975; PAVLOV. J. BIOL. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 52-61; BIBL. 7REF.Article

AVERSIVE SCHEDULES WITH INDEPENDENT PROBABILITIES OF REINFORCEMENT FOR RESPONDING AND NOT RESPONDING BY RHESUS MONKEYS: III. RECOVERY OF AVOIDANCE BASELINEKOP PFM; KADDEN RM; SCHOENFELD WN et al.1974; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 87; NO 6; PP. 1198-1208; BIBL. 16REF.Article

MOLECULAR CONTINGENCIES: REINFORCEMENT PROBABILITY. = LES CONTINGENCES MOLECULAIRES: LA PROBABILITE DE RENFORCEMENTHALE JM; SHIMP CP.1975; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 315-321; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

AVERSIVE SCHEDULES WITH INDEPENDENT PROBABILITIES OF REINFORCEMENT FOR RESPONDING AND NOT RESPONDING BY RHESUS MONKEYS: I. WITH SIGNAL = MODELES D'AVERSION AVEC DES PROBABILITES INDEPENDANTES DE RENFORCEMENT POUR LA REPONSE ET LA NON REPONSE PAR DES SINGES RHESUS: AVEC SIGNALKOP PFM.1974; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 87; NO 6; PP. 1180-1188; BIBL. 15REF.Article

AVERSIVE SCHEDULES WITH INDEPENDENT PROBABILITIES OF REINFORCEMENT FOR RESPONDING AND NOT RESPONDING BY RHESUS MONKEYS: II. WITHOUT SIGNALKADDEN RM; SCHOENFELD WN.1974; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 87; NO 6; PP. 1189-1197; BIBL. 17REF.Article

FREEDOM AND KNOWLEDGE: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF PREFERENCE IN PIGEONSCATANIA AC.1975; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 89-106; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

TEMPORAL CONTROL ON PERIODIC SCHEDULES: SIGNAL PROPERTIES OF REINFORCEMENT AND BLACKOUTSTARR BC; STADDON JER.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 535-545; BIBL. 26REF.Article

UNDERMATCHING AND STIMULUS DISCRIMINATION IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULESCHARMAN L; DAVISON M.1983; BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS LETTERS; ISSN 504882; NLD; DA. 1983; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 77-84; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT AND SIGNAL DETECTION.NEVIN JA; OLSON K; MANDELL C et al.1975; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 335-367; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

INSTRUMENTAL FOOD REFLEXES IN DOGS AT VARIOUS PROBABILITIES OF REINFORCEMENT.PREOBRAZHENSKAYA L.1977; ACTIV. NEW. SUP.; TCHECOSL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 19; NO 1; PP. 11; (INT. CONGR. COLL. INT. ACT. NEW. SUPER. 2. PROC.; PRAGUE; 1975)Conference Paper

THE EFFECT OF CONTINGENCY UPON THE APPETITIVE CONDITIONING OF FREE-OPERANT BEHAVIORHAMMOND LJ.1980; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 3; PP. 297-304; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

SHORT-TERM MEMORY IN THE PIGEON: THE PREVIOUSLY REINFORCED RESPONSE.SHIMP CP.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 26; NO 3; PP. 487-493; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF RATIO AND INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES WITH COMPARABLE INTERREINFORCEMENT TIMESCAPEHART GW; ECKERMAN DA; GUILKEY M et al.1980; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 1; PP. 61-76; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF INTERMITTENT FOOD IN THE INDUCTION OF ATTACK IN PIGEONSYOBURN BC; COHEN PS; CAMPAGNONI FR et al.1981; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 36; NO 1; PP. 101-117; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EFFECT OF FREQUENCY AND PROBABILITY OF REWARD ON CHOICE.GREY DA.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 42; NO 2; PP. 543-549; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

SECOND-ORDER AUTOSHAPED KEY PECKING BASED ON AN AUDITORY STIMULUSBURT JS; WESTBROOK RF.1980; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 3; PP. 305-318; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable componentsWHITAKER, S; LOWE, C. F; WEARDEN, J. H et al.Behavioural processes. 2008, Vol 77, Num 1, pp 33-42, issn 0376-6357, 10 p.Article

Properties of behavior under different random ratio and random interval schedules: a parametric studyDEMBO, M; BECERRA DE PENFOLD, J. B; RUIZ, R et al.Behavioural processes. 1985, Vol 10, Num 3, pp 241-248, issn 0376-6357Article

SPECIFICATION OF THE STIMULUS-REINFORCER RELATION IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES: DELAY AND PROBABILITY OF REINFORCEMENTBROWN BL; HEMMES NS; COLEMAN DA JR et al.1982; ANIM. LEARN. BEHAV.; ISSN 0090-4996; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 10; NO 3; PP. 365-376; BIBL. 29 REF.Article